My name is Kristen Tiede and I’m an intern in Dr. Camp’s lab. I supervise our volunteers, Kaitlyn Hosken and Avril MacNaughton. Visitors to the lab can view the many steps of archaeological lab work. Avril is hard at work cleaning and sorting the artifacts from the 2013 field school. She washes glass and ceramic and dry brushes metal artifacts before sorting them by material. She gets the first look at the artifacts before readying them for the cataloging process. She often finds small artifacts, like buttons, bits of fabric or leather, pencil stubs, and a sewing machine bobbin. Kaitlyn and I have been busy cataloging artifacts from the 2010 field school. We fill out a catalog form for each artifact, assigning it a unique catalog number. After we bag them, we place the smaller artifact bags in larger bags before putting them in plastic storage boxes. Eventually, the artifacts will be accessioned and curated. We still have quite a few artifacts to clean and catalog but slowly and steadily we are getting the job done.
Greetings everyone! This year’s field season has been one of great excitement and discoveries. We had an excellent field crew, and stayed at a very welcoming place (Three Rivers Resort in Lowell, ID). It was sad to end the field season last week, but we are very thankful for the company of Three Rivers Resort and the hospitality of Lowell and Kooskia residents.
This year we finished an extensive surface survey of a trash midden associated with the Kooskia Internment Camp as well as Canyon Creek Federal Prison. We thought we had done a fairly good job canvassing the site on our hands and knees (what is called a “crawl survey” rather than a “pedestrian survey”) back in 2010, but we quickly discovered that there was still a lot remaining on the surface of the midden that had yet to be discovered. With the energy of volunteers from the College of Western Idaho (led by CWI faculty member Nikki Gorrell who drove her students all the way from Boise to Kooskia!) and our students and volunteers, we were able to cover a broader span of land than in the previous field season. We searched under rocks, trees, water in the creek, brushes, and fallen trees to find additional artifacts associated with the internment camp era. Our crawl survey produced a number of exciting finds featured in the last blog post, including a hand-carving of an animal in a piece of rock (possibly an otter), a porcelain vase featuring a dragon clay relief, buttons, and gaming pieces.
One of our additional goals for 2013 was to attempt to determine the location of the camp’s Canteen. We are fairly confident we discovered the location of it based on the excavation of two 1×1 meter units that revealed very few artifacts. The presence of building-related artifacts on the surface of these units, such as insulators and electrical wiring, also suggests to us that we may have found the building’s former location.
Public Archaeology Day
One of the best parts of our job is to share what we have found with the public, as well as to give them a glimpse into the life of an archaeologist. We were fortunate to be able to host another Public Archaeology Day this year, and our crew did a brilliant job setting the event up and coming up with ideas for it. The event was widely advertised and we had over 50 people show up from it from all over the states of Idaho and Washington.
We had two tables that featured artifacts found during the 2013 excavations, along with identification books that helped show members of the public how archaeologists date, price, and interpret artifacts. We had a PowerPoint slideshow of finds from 2010 running on one of those tables, along with sign-in sheets at both tables to track who came to the event. A third table was dedicated to teaching children (and willing adults!) how to crossmend fragments from broken ceramics and glass, and a fourth table gave members of the public an opportunity to help clean artifacts recovered from the 2013.
Here are some images from our 2013 Public Archaeology Day:
This event did not happen without a lot of behind the scenes work and planning. The signs pictured below were provided by University of Idaho’s Communications and Marketing Team. Laura Ng, the Assistant Director of this year’s project, worked with interns Lawrence Shaw and Kristen Tiede to organize and publicize the event, which involved flyering local towns, contacting news and radio stations, and talking with local newspapers. We are thankful for the generous support of an NPS Japanese American Confinement Sites Grant for funding different items used in this event and in the field laboratory, including the artifact drying rack pictured below. Refreshments were generously provided by Three Rivers Resort, who has gone out of their way to help our project and support our research. We are thankful for their support and kindness during our 2013 field season.
Media and Press
We are also thrilled to see our research being featured in national news outlets, and are very grateful for the outpouring of support and information via emails, letters, and phone calls. I (Stacey) still have to get back to many people, and am trying to do that in the midst of getting ready for the fall semester and enjoying the last moments of summer with my children and husband. Here are some different news articles that have featured the research this summer:
Associated Press/Huffington Post News Article: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/27/kooskia-internment-camp_n_3663446.html
Lewiston Tribune News Article: (behind a paywall, we will be posting it shortly) http://lmtribune.com/northwest/article_954d4845-a2ea-5892-ad96-f0964b08ddb5.html?TNNoMobile
Moscow-Pullman Daily News Article: http://dnews.com/news_ap/washington/article_b7198ed2-d9b8-51b4-926d-4416057ca1a7.html
Finally, we are so very thankful to Dr. Priscilla Wegars for introducing us to the Kooskia Internment Camp and for all that she has done to get this project underway. Without her research we would not be able to do the wonderful archaeological work that has taken place in 2010 and 2013. Here is a link to her two books, which I highly recommend if you are interested in learning more information on the Kooskia Internment Camp: http://www.uiweb.uidaho.edu/aacc/KOOSKIA.HTM
Thanks again to everyone – students, supporters, staff, and volunteers – for a wonderful summer!
It’s incredible what can be revealed when the vestiges of time are removed. A seemingly ordinary piece of rock turns out to be a unique piece of art. A small sherd of ceramic is cleaned and exhibits a mark telling us precisely who made it, and where and when it was made. These small, yet significant discoveries are the privilege of the archaeological field lab. We take plastic bags from the field excavation and surface collection, which are teeming with nearly as much dirt as artifacts, and we clean and sort them. Often, we find and see things that went unnoticed in the field, where they were obscured by a layer of dirt or overlooked as workers hurried to do their job.
The field lab is made up of some rather simple tools and equipment. On picnic tables we lay out plastic trays, bowls, and a handful of toothbrushes. Field bags are poured onto a tray, then sorted by material type. Glass and ceramic artifacts are washed in the bowls with plain water and a toothbrush. We are careful to watch for anything that may be rubbed off by the toothbrushes—the remnants of a paper label, or a delicate decoration. Metal and rubber artifacts are cleaned with a dry toothbrush, and organic and synthetic materials (such as bones, paper, or leather) are dry brushed unless they are too fragile. After everything has been cleaned, it is laid out on a drawer of a stackable drying rack for at least one day. Ceramic can absorb water, so we are careful to make sure that it is completely dry before it is re-bagged.
Megan dry-brushing some metal
Kathy and Megan cleaning artifacts
Though field lab work is more mellow, and often simpler than the field excavation work, it is an equally important component. For the Kooskia Internment Camp project, which produces significant amounts of artifacts (nearly two hundred bags in the first week and a half), a field lab is especially crucial. Getting even a small portion of the artifacts cleaned in the field saves valuable time later on, when more energy should be exerted on research and analysis rather than cleaning. Furthermore, cleaning artifacts in the field often reveals something that may influence field work. For instance, the lab crew may discover that a certain area is producing artifacts that have a higher concentration of Japanese porcelain, and could therefore suggest that an excavation unit be placed in that area.
Porcelain tea cup, hand-painted and gilded
Hand-painted porcelain saucer
Porcelain vessel with dragon motif
The field schools students really enjoy working in the lab, and not only because it’s a break from the more exerting work done in the field. I too enjoy teaching them how to recognize, clean, and identify different types of artifacts. For all of us, it is exciting to watch an artifact transform in our hands once it has been cleaned—something that is not always possible in the field. Not to say that every artifact we clean is exciting (the volume of non-diagnostic glass shards, nails, and small bits of metal does get tiring), but the treasures which occasionally come along make up for any tedium. Some of the fascinating and favorite artifacts include the Japanese porcelain pictured above, which likely were transported to the site by the internees. Another spectacular item is what appears to be a hand-carved animal figure on a flat piece of soft stone, with an anthropomorphized face. It is still unclear if it was made at the site or brought there. Other items tell us about the mundane aspects of the internees’ life. A metal denture mold reminds us that they did have access to dental care at one point. Nail clippers tell us that they had access to basic grooming tools. Bottles and ceramic dishes with maker’s marks give us an idea of what products they used, and how the camp was supplied with its basic equipment, such as tableware.
Carved stone figure, possibly an otter, possibly made at the site
Button, possibly left over or re-used from the prison
Ceramic base with maker’s mark
Glass bottle made by the Owens-Illinois Company
Greetings from a very hot Lowell, Idaho! We have completed the first week on the second field season of the Kooskia Internment Camp Archaeological Project and have survived torrential rain, an unexpected high water level of the creek we need to cross, and intense heat. However, we have done a pretty exceptional job considering the challenges and made great progress.
This year we have two staff members besides myself (Stacey Camp) helping to direct the project. Laura Ng is our Assistant Field Director/Crew Chief, and she has worked at two former Japanese American incarceration sites: Amache (Granada) and Manzanar. She is writing her MA thesis on Manzanar and should be finishing up at the University of Massachusetts Boston soon. Jessica Goodwin is our Laboratory Field Manager/Crew Chief and is currently working on her MA at the University of Idaho. She worked with me on the Cyrus Jacobs-Uberuaga Public Archaeology Project last summer, and is writing her thesis on the archaeology from that project. Kali Warren is our resident Laboratory Director for this summer and did an absolutely fabulous job organizing, cleaning, and loading equipment for us to take to Kooskia – this was a huge organizational job and she deserves lots of kudos for doing such a great job. Kyla Fitz-Gerald also served as a graduate student Crew Chief intern this summer and was a great help during the first week of the project. She made this great video of the first week of the project:
We also have two undergraduate interns – Kristen Tiede and Lawrence Shaw – joining us this summer on a Key Fund Grant through the University of Idaho’s College of Letters, Arts, and Social Sciences.
Our first week was an adventure. The staff – Laura, Jessica, Kyla, and me (and Kali while we were in Moscow) – packed up the van last Monday and headed out to Kooskia on Monday afternoon. We got into Kooskia late in the evening and then spent the next day organizing equipment, unpacking, visiting the site, and doing a staff orientation. During our site visit it rained, and the creek water level was higher than it was last summer in 2010. This posed a challenge for getting across the creek. In addition, we discovered that the cable we had been using had disappeared, meaning that we had nothing to stabilize us while crossing the creek. This made me nervous, so we enlisted the help of a local who does horse treks and pack trains. He got a rope up for us, which solved part of the problem. The creek was also really cold when we arrived (since then it has warmed up), so we bought a wet suit to keep us warm when crossing.
Three Rivers Resort, which is where we are staying, was kind enough to loan us life jackets as another safety measure. The creek is not incredibly deep, but it is enough to make us worry just a little bit more than the summer of 2010. Our students helped blow up a boat and create a pulley system that allows us to move equipment across the creek with the boat. The boat might not make it to the end of the field season, but it
While the start to the field season was a little rough, once we got everything set up we were able to start work on time and begin to re-establish the grid system we used in 2010.
We conducted another surface survey of a landscape we studied in 2010, which is still in progress because of the size of the site and extent of the archaeological deposits. We are hoping to be done with it on Friday or Saturday of this coming week.
We also opened up our first excavation unit of the season and are planning to open up more this coming week (week 2).
We have 12 anthropology students coming from the College of Western Idaho this week, along with their department chair, Dr. Nikki Gorrell, to help with our project. We have had a number of volunteers stay with us this past week, too, including Melissa’s mom, Hanako (she is an Interpretive Specialist at the Old Idaho Penitentiary State Historic Site in Boise), and Brianna, a high school student from Northern California.
I also conducted a surface survey and collection of artifact’s in the creek, which involved a lot of water and a number of insect bites. Here are some of the discoveries from that survey.
This week has gone by very quickly thanks to the great staff, volunteers, and students we have on this year’s project. We are so thankful for everyone’s support in this project and for this field season up and running. It is really a pleasure to be back at this important, historical site and work to get it back on the map of American memory.
By Kali D.V. Oliver
The men at Kooskia were in a unique place among internment camps, not only because it was the only all-male camp, or even because the men were given wages and had agency enough to choose if they wanted to come into, or transfer out of, the camp, but because there were South American Japanese internees as well. The backstory to this statement more than deserves its own blog, so I will save it for another day, but the gist of their situation went a little something like this. During WWII, U.S. representatives were concerned about the safe return of captured American soldiers. However, they faced a bit of a quagmire. There were no soldier-prisoners to trade. After all, those displaced into internment camps could not be “traded” for soldiers. In many cases, the second generation internees were actually naturalized citizens, and who could say that one type of American was worth more than another. So, to avoid yet another political nightmare amidst war, a deal was made within areas of South America that were already experiencing high racial tensions and outbursts of violence towards those of Japanese heritage. The political tensions for Japanese in South America as well ran so deep that after the end of the war when internment camps were dispersed within the United States, South America Japanese internees were refused the right to re-enter the country for nearly 10 years.
To get back on track, why is this important to the beer at Kooskia? Well, since there were South American Japanese internees at Kooskia, a copy of the Geneva Convention was posted within the camp. This allowed internees, even from the first few months of the camp’s opening, to petition for everything from better health care standards to, yep you guessed it, the right to imbibe (Kooskia Internment Camp Archives 1943-1990s).
However, this is not the only link to the right to consume. Some ten years earlier, at the closing of the year 1933, the 18th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was repealed, and prohibition was no longer (Wilma, 2001). From then on and still today, it is every person’s right, if they are of legal age, to consume alcohol leisurely. So, in June of 1943, it was granted that the men of Kooskia could run their own canteen, and when that happened, they could also dispense beer (Kooskia Internment Camp Archives, 1943). So, not only did the men at Kooskia have basic humanitarian rights, they would, have the same right that so many other Americans so shortly before had fought to win, to drink.
Finally, it is time for the “archaeology lesson” portion of the blog. Pictured here are two bottle fragments that represent part of the leisure time consumption of alcoholic beverages. Notice that even though they may look like plain amber glass bottles, the neck and body portions of these pieces vary. One style is called a “Stubbie” and the other a “Steinie,” and both are machine-made bottles produced during the 19th century (Lindsey, 2013). Unfortunately for the glass industry, beer cans became popular in a big way around the end of prohibition. Unfortunately for the can industry, WWII broke out and the popularity of cans was no match for the demand of metal during a shortage of resources, especially when glass could be re-used if necessary. No fear, there is a happy ending; both cans and bottles, including the Stubbie and Steinie style, survive to this day.
The bottle on the right of the picture above is a Stubbie. Provided here, as well, is a picture from the SHA website exhibiting what the entire bottle looks like. The Stubbie was created, approximately, in 1935 and has three major characteristics: virtually no neck, in many cases a raised horizontal shoulder line (poss. fill line), and a well-rounded heel (making it smaller at the base than the body). Usually the most common size of Stubbie had a carrying capacity of 11 oz., though it was made in quart size, for example the SchlitzTM Ruby Red beer. The Stubbie style hit its peak of popularity for two to three decades following the 1940s, and can still be found in use today in varying countries, for example Red Stripe Beer ® (Lindsey, 2013).
The bottle on the left of the picture above is a Steinie, again a picture from SHA.org/bottle provides a full-object comparison. Can you see the differences now? This barrel bodied fellow has: a moderate neck with a “step-up,” or bulge, and a pretty sharp heel. Though both styles have crown-cap finishes, it would seem that the bulb under the lip portion on the Steinie style is more round, perhaps to match the neck bulge, where the Stubbier style seems droopier; however, I cannot be sure if this is a rule that can be counted upon for identifying style or just one exception. The Steinie style beer bottle had a carrying capacity of approximately 11-12 oz in its most common size, though it also came in a quart version, and was most popular from its creation in 1936 to the 1950s. Apparently, the unique neck on the Steinie, and likely the name of the style, was designed as an advertising technique to remind consumers of the taller version of export beers at the time (Lindsey, 2013), which makes sense.
I hope this has been as fun to read as it has been to research. Please feel free to contact us about any of the research or findings produced on this blog at scamp.uidaho.edu. For information on other beers at the site, please scroll down to see Kelsi Lee’s post “Alcohol Consumption at the Kooskia Internment Camp.”
Kooskia Internment Camp Archives
1943 Government Public Records, complied by Dr. Priscilla Wegars, pertaining to WWII internment. Kooskia Internment Camp Archaeological Project, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID.
2013 Bottle Typing/Diagnostic Shapes. Historic Glass Bottle Identification & Information Website, Society for Historical Archaeology. <http://www.sha.org/bottle/beer.htm>. Accessed 1 June 2013.
2001 Prohibition ends of December 5, 1933. History Link, Online Encyclopedia of Washington State History. < http://www.historylink.org/index.cfm?DisplayPage=output.cfm&File_Id=3343>. Accessed 1 June 2013.
 It is posited in the SHA article I am referencing that the “horizontal line” is possibly a fill line, as a person who brews at home, I have to agree with their consensus. There are different tools for this now, but when bottling home brews the addition of the corn sugar to the beer, over a period of time, is what creates carbonation, leading to head. If you do not leave enough room in the bottle, it could explode, if you leave too much, well it turns out flatter than anticipated.
I am back as a research assistant for part of this summer; so, hopefully this means some new and exciting lab blogs about things we are finding while cataloging my favorite material type: glass. This last week several fragments I knew to be lenses of some kind kept coming across my desk. Of course I have been pondering now for days about their true function. Several possibilities came to mind: flashlight lens, movie projector lens, medical/lab equipment lens. All of these were, and still are, viable possibilities, as there are several round lenses varying in thickness from ~1mm to ~3mm and in diameter from 4.5cm x 4.5cm and 5cm x 5cm that have been examined so far. However, the largest and thickest of the lenses appears to be associated with safety goggles (click the link for some recently sold antique photos of what the goggles may have looked like)!
Imagine how happy I was to finally come across a fragment, though warped from heat within the incinerator, that had an etched makers mark in them…delirious is the work that comes to mind. I started off on a research trail, and landed on the website of the only company I could find that had been open under that name during the timeframe we were looking at for Kooskia. Unfortunately, after contacting this company it was determined the lenses were not crafted by them. I will continue to search. The images below are associated with the same makers marks and timeframe, and I believe the glasses we have lenses for probably look something like this:
Please note: Stacey and I are working in between two labs, and she is preparing to go back into the field this summer with more students; so, with our resources spread out I have not yet been able to cross list our archival records with the purchase of safety goggles for more information. However, I have researched the subjects of health and safety within Kooskia’s archives prior to this summer, and I know they did order safety gear. I do not believe any other information than a basic description of “goggles” is listed, but I will continue to research this items and either edit this post or put new ones up on the subject, so bare with me a little while longer.Questions:
- Did CESCO make their own line of safety goggles during and/or prior to 1945? If so, did the lenses come in varying thicknesses, or was there just one general type?
- If yes to the first question, then was the company shipping nationally at this point (i.e. is it plausible for items to have been shipped to the Pacific Northwest during WWII or the preceding decade)?
- Were they awarded any federal contracts between 1933 and 1945 that would have requested safety (or other electrical) supplies for internment or conservation corps camps?
Background on Kooskia:
Kooskia Internment Camp (located just outside of Kooskia, Idaho-central panhandle region) was open from May 1943 to May 1945 and was the only all-male, volunteer-based work camp in the United States. Unlike other internment camps, as volunteers, the men at Kooskia had the agency to choose when to come and when to leave; they were able to have family visitors, earn wages, and petition for better healthcare standards during a time of imprisonment. They worked on the construction of what is now called HWY 12, between Lewiston Idaho and Missoula Montana. Prior to the internment camp, Kooskia was also a CCC camp, beginning in 1933.
- The lenses we have found so far vary in thickness greatly from ~1cm to ~3cm. This is why I asked the company if they made more than one type of protective lens.
- Other possible functions for thinner lenses may include: part of flashlights, medical/lab equipment, or movie projector.
- The number of workers at Kooskia averaged around 100 volunteers at any given time (fluctuating greatly as the men did come and go to other camps to be with their families or for other personal reasons), this number would relate to the volume of the possible order requested of the company at that time.
- Overall, it would seem likely that we find a high volume of safety glass lenses, at least in comparison to other possible lens types. It is also highly probable that an order would have been placed for safety gear via government personnel in May 1943 or the month that followed, but we can not rule out the possibility that safety goggles were also used and disposed of in the same area by the Conservation Corps.
- Any information we receive from CESCO can potentially help to source these artifacts and possibly address whether the items we are finding in the incinerator belong specifically to the internment camp, or can also be associated with the earlier CCC occupation.
Thanks for your time everyone. I hope to post on this again soon.
Note on References: Clicking on the eBay pictures provides links to the sites. All other references are from Kooskia archival records held by the Bower’s Laboratory and Dr. Stacey Camp at the University of Idaho.
The artifact researched for this blog post was a single sherd of whiteware with a molded edge featuring a decal design of a blue bird and pink flowers. After conducting several fruitless internet searches in an attempt to identify the manufacturer, I finally made contact with a University of Idaho graduate student, Ashley Morton, who was able to solve the mystery. The sherd turned out to be a classic “blue bird” design manufactured widely by the Homer Laughlin Ceramics Company. Homer Laughlin used this decal in several different ways on several different dinnerware designs in order to create new, affordable styles between 1917 and 1959. The sherd recovered from Kooskia came from a piece “Republic” style dinnerware, identifiable by its slightly scalloped molded edge. The blue bird motif was most popular in America in the late 1920s and early 1930s.
Based on the fact that the bluebird sherd was recovered from the incinerator feature, it is likely that it was deposited as refuse. Unfortunately, the disturbed nature of the context in which it was found on the surface precludes any kind of dating that we may have been able to attain from soil stratigraphy. Without such a reference, we are left with the manufacture dates of this particular kind of ceramic which ranges from 1917-1959 to use as a relative dating tool. We know that the Kooskia Internment Camp operated as a Civilian Conservation Corps camp and federal prison in the years prior to World War II, becoming operational as an Internment camp in May of 1943 through May of 1945. Since even the earliest dates of occupation, when Kooskia was established as a CCC camp in 1933, correspond with the manufacture dates of Homer Laughlin Republic tableware featuring the bluebird decals, it is hard to narrow down when it may have been deposited. Knowing when it was deposited may offer insight into who deposited it which in turn may illuminate questions as to whom it may have belonged to. Perhaps the first research question should be how was it deposited? If we are going to assume that it was discarded as garbage there are more questions that beg answering: Was all refuse from the camp disposed of in the incinerator? Was internee refuse separated from refuse created by the guards? If they were disposed of separately, was this behavior prescribed or coincidental? Answering such questions may provide insight into such issues as sanitation practices, socioeconomic status of non-internees and possibly the modes of acquisition of personal possessions belonging internees.